IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Livio Azevedo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-28 Country: Switzerland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 42 13 40 53 1.262 0.1699 0.1697 0.4296 0.4291
2023-24 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 37 20 23 43 1.162 0.1564 0.1487 0.3956 0.3760
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 25 1 5 6 0.240
2024-25 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 22 3 2 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2024-25 · SUNY Brockport
+69.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25672
Forward overall
#1146
Forward born in 2003
#504
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christopher Mammas
Canton · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Lovisek
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Ausmus
Concordia · 2021-22
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.