IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braeden Doust Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 5 1 2 3 0.600 0.0554 0.0566 0.1374 0.1405
2016-17 Northern Cyclones EHL 46 9 9 18 0.391 0.0904 0.0895 0.1915 0.1897
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC GR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Buffalo State D1 SUNYAC JR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2018-19 Buffalo State D1 SUNYAC SO 17 6 1 7 0.412
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 17 6 1 7 0.412
2017-18 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 17 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#39340
Forward overall
#1914
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Laurila
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stuckless
Skidmore · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Beard
Daniel Webster · 2014-15
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.