IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Tam Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Nepean Raiders CCHL 55 3 14 17 0.309 0.0882 0.0930 0.2393 0.2524
2015-16 Nepean Raiders CCHL 62 3 13 16 0.258 0.0737 0.0742 0.1998 0.2011
2016-17 Nepean Raiders CCHL 62 4 18 22 0.355 0.1013 0.0966 0.2747 0.2620
2017-18 Nepean Raiders CCHL 62 4 16 20 0.323 0.0921 0.0831 0.2497 0.2253
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 26 1 10 11 0.423
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 26 3 13 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2018-19 · SUNY Brockport
+637.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13619
Defenseman overall
#1899
Defenseman born in 1997
#1588
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

P.A. Martineau
Hobart · 2017-18
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vince Guiducci
Wentworth · 2001-02
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Schrank
Elmira · 2006-07
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.