IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shannon McNevan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-03-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Peterborough Bees OJHL 47 27 40 67 1.425 0.3494 0.3398 0.9815 0.9544
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 24 13 9 22 0.917
2003-04 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 24 13 9 22 0.917
2002-03 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 23 8 6 14 0.609
2001-02 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 26 6 6 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2001-02 · Bowdoin
+58.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8071
Forward overall
#274
Forward born in 1982
#91
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Schmidt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Willem Nong-Lambert
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christian Heil
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brian Morgan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2005-06
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Evans
Westfield State · 2008-09
0.950 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Catanzaro
SUNY Cortland · 2001-02
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.