IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Darren Doherty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-05-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 49 30 32 62 1.265 0.3101 0.3037 0.8712 0.8531
2001-02 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 49 42 39 81 1.653 0.4052 0.3758 1.1382 1.0557
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 RIT D1 AHA SR 30 8 11 19 0.633
2004-05 RIT D1 AHA JR 23 5 17 22 0.957
2003-04 RIT D1 AHA SO 24 10 17 27 1.125
2002-03 RIT D1 AHA FR 25 10 12 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2002-03 · RIT
+196.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7354
Forward overall
#244
Forward born in 1982
#67
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ty Enns
Marian · 2017-18
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morton
Curry · 2023-24
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.