← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Stalmok Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 20 4 6 10 0.500 0.0465 0.0487 0.1145 0.1199
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 43 17 6 23 0.535 0.0497 0.0492 — —
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 43 17 16 33 0.767 0.1007 0.0949 0.2605 0.2454
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Assumption D2 NE10 — 32 11 12 23 0.719
2021-22 Assumption D2 NE10 — 27 5 7 12 0.444
2019-20 Assumption D1 NE10 SO 13 2 2 4 0.308
2019-20 Assumption D2 NE10 — 13 2 2 4 0.308
2018-19 Assumption D1 NE10 FR 22 4 3 7 0.318
2018-19 Assumption D2 NE10 — 22 4 3 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2018-19 · Assumption
+385.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34775
Forward overall
#1654
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.