← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Gorbett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Northern Cyclones EHL 43 7 14 21 0.488 0.1719 0.1764 0.2395 0.2457
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 43 15 17 32 0.744 0.2453 0.2338 0.2532 0.2413
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 26 10 10 20 0.769
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 JR 6 1 3 4 0.667
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 6 1 3 4 0.667
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 SO 32 7 20 27 0.844
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 32 7 20 27 0.844
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D1 FR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 23 3 4 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2018-19 · Franklin Pierce
+68.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25941
Forward overall
#1169
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2021-22
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.