← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Harlow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New England Wolves EHL 15 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 New England Wolves EHL 49 30 14 44 0.898 0.1314 0.1314 0.4403 0.4403
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 SR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast JR 3 2 0 2 0.667
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 3 2 0 2 0.667
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast SO 18 0 1 1 0.056
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 18 0 1 1 0.056
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast FR 23 3 3 6 0.261
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 23 3 3 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2018-19 · UMass Dartmouth
+131.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
75%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31635
Forward overall
#1581
Forward born in 1998
#1049
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2017-18
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.