IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Culver Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 43 8 2 10 0.233 0.0664 0.0667 0.1801 0.1808
2016-17 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 58 3 4 7 0.121 0.0344 0.0327 0.0934 0.0888
2017-18 Rochester Monarchs NCDC 49 9 7 16 0.327 0.0920 0.0852 0.2643 0.2447
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 26 4 14 18 0.692
2020-21 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 10 1 3 4 0.400
2019-20 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 28 2 1 3 0.107
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 26 1 5 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2018-19 · Nazareth
+319.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46765
Forward overall
#2282
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Garvey
Concordia Wisconsin · 2016-17
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Gullo
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Lubczuk
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.