IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Keller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 12 7 19 0.463 0.1301 0.1336 0.3810 0.3913
2017-18 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 49 11 19 30 0.612 0.2496 0.2405 0.4921 0.4742
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Cortland D1 — SO 6 1 0 1 0.167
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 6 1 0 1 0.167
2018-19 Cortland D1 — FR 20 3 2 5 0.250
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 20 3 2 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2018-19 · Cortland
+47.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18728
Forward overall
#831
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grant Parshall
King's · 2023-24
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Grant Newcomer
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.