IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Triston Theriot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Evansville Jr. Thunderbolts NA3HL 42 6 12 18 0.429 0.0538 0.0546 0.1353 0.1374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 13 3 7 10 0.769
2019-20 Westfield State D1 MASCAC SO 27 2 6 8 0.296
2019-20 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 27 2 6 8 0.296
2018-19 Westfield State D1 MASCAC FR 24 2 3 5 0.208
2018-19 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 24 2 3 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2018-19 · Westfield State
+304.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17345
Defenseman overall
#2373
Defenseman born in 1997
#2857
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Bockmann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2006-07
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Carter
Finlandia · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Mather
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.