IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Kozek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 38 5 12 17 0.447 0.0333 0.0336 0.1025 0.1034
2017-18 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 44 11 23 34 0.773 0.0872 0.0838 0.2629 0.2527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 25 2 4 6 0.240
2020-21 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Framingham State D1 — SO 25 1 0 1 0.040
2019-20 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 25 1 0 1 0.040
2018-19 Framingham State D1 — FR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2018-19 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 25 1 2 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2018-19 · Framingham State
+99.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
10%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7809
Defenseman overall
#1436
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Sorensen
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Dockry
St. Thomas · 2012-13
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Prost
Western New England · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.