IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Lapshanski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 17 1 1 2 0.118 0.0172 0.0173 0.0576 0.0581
2017-18 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 48 0 17 17 0.354 0.0519 0.0495 0.1735 0.1654
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2020-21 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wentworth D1 CNE SO 27 0 1 1 0.037
2019-20 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 27 0 1 1 0.037
2018-19 Wentworth D1 CNE FR 16 0 3 3 0.188
2018-19 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 16 0 3 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2018-19 · Wentworth
+441.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18178
Defenseman overall
#2441
Defenseman born in 1997
#2235
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grady Friedman
UMass Boston · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Rochowiak
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Charlie Singerhouse
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.