IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tom Reilly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 21 4 8 12 0.571 0.0717 0.0762 0.1804 0.1917
2015-16 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 9 3 4 7 0.778 0.0976 0.0990 0.2456 0.2491
2016-17 — NA3HL 11 3 3 6 0.545 0.0685 0.0660 0.1722 0.1659
2017-18 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 43 24 27 51 1.186 0.1488 0.1358 0.3744 0.3418
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen FR 15 0 2 2 0.133
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 15 0 2 2 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2018-19 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+44.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29365
Forward overall
#1349
Forward born in 1997
#1017
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marco Iozzo
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon MacKinnon
Concordia · 2017-18
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Miles
Salem State · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.