IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Manastersky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-05-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 42 2 21 23 0.548 0.1342 0.1383 0.3748 0.3863
2001-02 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 7 33 40 0.816 0.2001 0.1959 0.5588 0.5471
2002-03 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 49 8 33 41 0.837 0.2051 0.1923 0.5727 0.5370
2003-04 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 42 6 25 31 0.738 0.1809 0.1615 0.5052 0.4510
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 21 0 7 7 0.333
2004-05 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 16 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4861
Defenseman overall
#693
Defenseman born in 1983
#1012
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Louis DiMatteo
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Ring-Jarvi
Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matteo Viglino
New England College · 2024-25
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.