← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maxwell Roth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 34 1 5 6 0.176 0.0408 0.0408 0.0864 0.0864
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 50 3 26 29 0.580 0.1340 0.1265 0.2838 0.2680
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC GR 23 7 6 13 0.565
2021-22 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 25 7 9 16 0.640
2020-21 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 24 1 2 3 0.125
2018-19 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 21 0 1 1 0.048
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2018-19 · Worcester State
-45.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11377
Defenseman overall
#1825
Defenseman born in 1997
#1440
in EHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.