← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Strong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 42 5 3 8 0.191 0.0318 0.0324 0.0793 0.0808
2013-14 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 51 11 19 30 0.588 0.0982 0.0955 0.2449 0.2380
2014-15 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 50 17 29 46 0.920 0.1536 0.1404 0.3830 0.3501
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen SR 11 1 2 3 0.273
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 11 1 2 3 0.273
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 18 0 2 2 0.111
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 28 4 5 9 0.321
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 24 1 6 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+152.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10387
Defenseman overall
#1420
Defenseman born in 1994
#552
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2024-25
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.