IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Koras Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-06-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Port Hope Clippers OJHL 47 9 9 18 0.383 0.0939 0.0971 0.2622 0.2713
2001-02 Port Hope Predators OJHL 44 7 17 24 0.545 0.1337 0.1314 0.3734 0.3670
2002-03 Kanata Stallions CCHL 22 4 8 12 0.545 0.1183 0.1131 0.4223 0.4036
2003-04 Oakville Blades OJHL 29 6 10 16 0.552 0.1352 0.1212 0.3776 0.3385
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 25 10 20 30 1.200
2006-07 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 26 2 19 21 0.808
2005-06 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 25 4 9 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2005-06 · SUNY Brockport
+414.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33477
Forward overall
#917
Forward born in 1983
#1905
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Mitchell
Neumann · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bron Loiselle
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Williams
Marian · 2007-08
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.