IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Ellerton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 46 2 11 13 0.283 0.0476 0.0461 0.1174 0.1138
2017-18 Seahawks Hockey EHL 42 2 11 13 0.309 0.0664 0.0628 0.1516 0.1433
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 8 0 1 1 0.125
2018-19 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19430
Defenseman overall
#2442
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Webster
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Koviak
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Papayoanou
Southern Maine · 2016-17
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.