IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Dom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-07-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 36 2 8 10 0.278 0.0258 0.0255 0.0636 0.0630
2017-18 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 44 5 15 20 0.455 0.0596 0.0562 0.1543 0.1455
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 18 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Chatham D1 UCHC JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2019-20 Chatham D1 UCHC SO 11 1 0 1 0.091
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 11 1 0 1 0.091
2018-19 Chatham D1 UCHC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16051
Defenseman overall
#2278
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Erickson
Williams · 2011-12
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Swingle
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Parnell
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.