IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Britner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 33 7 16 23 0.697 0.1496 0.1566 0.3413 0.3573
2016-17 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 41 9 19 28 0.683 0.1466 0.1468 0.3344 0.3349
2017-18 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 41 11 30 41 1.000 0.2146 0.2030 0.4897 0.4633
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SR 24 7 2 9 0.375
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 3 1 0 1 0.333
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 25 3 6 9 0.360
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23162
Forward overall
#998
Forward born in 1997
#283
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Ott
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Bistodeau
Hobart · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Humphreys
Concordia · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.