IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Monteleone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-06-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Cornwall Colts CCHL 21 1 6 7 0.333 0.0723 0.0704 0.2579 0.2510
2017-18 Cornwall Colts CCHL 47 3 10 13 0.277 0.0600 0.0553 0.2140 0.1973
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 16 0 3 3 0.188
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 17 0 2 2 0.118
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17818
Defenseman overall
#2414
Defenseman born in 1997
#1433
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Beau Orser
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Avery Huibregtse
Finlandia · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
George Peterson
Bethel · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.