← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Hott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 35 2 18 20 0.571 0.0426 0.0417 0.1309 0.1282
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 42 3 10 13 0.309 0.0349 0.0325 0.1051 0.0979
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 21 2 5 7 0.333
2020-21 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Saint Anselm D1 NE10 SO 13 0 3 3 0.231
2019-20 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 13 0 3 3 0.231
2018-19 Saint Anselm D1 NE10 FR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16842
Defenseman overall
#2334
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.