IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0642 0.0619 0.2429 0.2344
2001-02 Omaha Lancers USHL 46 7 8 15 0.326 0.1924 0.1784 0.9608 0.8909
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 13 1 3 4 0.308
2005-06 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 36 4 3 7 0.194
2004-05 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 36 4 4 8 0.222
2003-04 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 38 2 10 12 0.316
2002-03 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 33 3 5 8 0.242
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2002-03 · Alaska Anchorage
+114.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28026
Forward overall
#656
Forward born in 1981

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Sicard
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.