IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Hamilton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-02-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 19 2 2 4 0.210 0.0516 0.0526 0.1449 0.1477
2001-02 — OJHL 47 4 16 20 0.425 0.1043 0.1009 0.2930 0.2835
2002-03 Burlington Cougars OJHL 30 2 8 10 0.333 0.0817 0.0757 0.2295 0.2126
2003-04 Burlington Cougars OJHL 44 11 21 32 0.727 0.1783 0.1571 0.5007 0.4413
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 14 2 4 6 0.429
2004-05 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2004-05 · Fredonia
-34.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9844
Defenseman overall
#973
Defenseman born in 1983
#2038
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Drapluk
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Pearce Vance
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bennett Weycker
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.