IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Lachaine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Navan Grads CCHL 62 8 10 18 0.290 0.0630 0.0602 0.2246 0.2145
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2021-22 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2020-21 Suffolk D1 CNE SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2019-20 Suffolk D1 CNE FR 23 5 5 10 0.435
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 23 5 5 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2019-20 · Suffolk
+744.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48488
Forward overall
#2853
Forward born in 1999
#1468
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Johns
Chatham · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Garvey
Concordia · 2015-16
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Magill-Diaz
Curry · 2016-17
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.