IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Hawkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Brockville Braves CCHL 61 11 25 36 0.590 0.1280 0.1253 0.4569 0.4471
2018-19 Brockville Braves CCHL 62 17 25 42 0.677 0.1469 0.1372 0.5244 0.4898
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 25 5 11 16 0.640
2021-22 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 21 4 8 12 0.571
2020-21 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 26 3 5 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2019-20 · Hamilton
+171.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27341
Forward overall
#1340
Forward born in 1998
#580
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Flynn
Babson · 2016-17
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Kroon
St. Scholastica · 2024-25
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Konnar Dechaine
Wisconsin-Stout · 2016-17
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.