← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Whelan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 38 10 11 21 0.553 0.0923 0.0947 0.2300 0.2359
2018-19 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 55 29 14 43 0.782 0.1306 0.1206 0.3255 0.3005
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE SR 16 2 1 3 0.188
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE JR 22 3 4 7 0.318
2020-21 Curry D1 CNE SO 4 1 1 2 0.500
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE SO 4 1 1 2 0.500
2019-20 Curry D1 CNE FR 20 4 3 7 0.350
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE FR 20 4 3 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · Curry
+270.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34500
Forward overall
#1729
Forward born in 1998
#496
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Morrisville · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2023-24
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.