IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-05-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2002-03 Ajax Axemen OJHL 36 0 6 6 0.167 0.0409 0.0403 0.1148 0.1131
2003-04 Aurora Tigers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2004-05 Milton Menace OJHL 47 0 13 13 0.277 0.0678 0.0603 0.1904 0.1694
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Nichols D3 CNE SR 26 6 4 10 0.385
2009-10 Nichols D3 CNE JR 20 3 7 10 0.500
2008-09 Nichols D3 CNE SO 29 7 11 18 0.621
2007-08 Nichols D3 CNE FR 28 2 10 12 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2007-08 · Nichols
+767.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22368
Defenseman overall
#1494
Defenseman born in 1984
#4203
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Overton
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Brunton
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ricardo Yesue
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.