icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Wexford Raiders | OJHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2001-02 | Wexford Raiders | OJHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2002-03 | Wexford Raiders | OJHL | 35 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 1.286 | 0.3862 | 0.3945 | 0.8801 | 0.8990 |
| 2003-04 | Wexford Raiders | OJHL | 46 | 22 | 35 | 57 | 1.239 | 0.3722 | 0.3634 | 0.8482 | 0.8282 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Quinnipiac | D1 | — | SR | 34 | 11 | 23 | 34 | 1.000 |
| 2006-07 | Quinnipiac | D1 | — | JR | 40 | 14 | 23 | 37 | 0.925 |
| 2005-06 | Quinnipiac | D1 | — | SO | 39 | 21 | 20 | 41 | 1.051 |
| 2004-05 | Quinnipiac | D1 | — | FR | 30 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 0.567 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.