← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rob Sheehan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 35 13 20 33 0.943 0.1657 0.1687 0.2160 0.2199
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier 44 16 14 30 0.682 0.2247 0.2283 0.2319 0.2356
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 King's D3 MAC SR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2021-22 King's D3 MAC JR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 King's D3 MAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 King's D1 FR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2019-20 King's D3 MAC FR 25 3 3 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2019-20 · King's
+37.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
75%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28105
Forward overall
#1355
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2021-22
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.