IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Ray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 48 7 15 22 0.458 0.1613 0.1693 0.2247 0.2359
2018-19 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 38 8 14 22 0.579 0.2037 0.2036 0.2838 0.2837
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 25 4 3 7 0.280
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 20 2 3 5 0.250
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 24 1 5 6 0.250
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 24 1 5 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · Southern New Hampshire
+53.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30327
Forward overall
#1605
Forward born in 1999
#968
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob McPartland
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conklin
Canton · 2017-18
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Boby
Utica · 2011-12
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.