← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Ray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 48 7 15 22 0.458 0.1059 0.1112 0.2242 0.2354
2018-19 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 38 8 14 22 0.579 0.1337 0.1336 0.2833 0.2832
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 25 4 3 7 0.280
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 20 2 3 5 0.250
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 24 1 5 6 0.250
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 24 1 5 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · Southern New Hampshire
+134.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30796
Forward overall
#1633
Forward born in 1999
#974
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2010-11
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.