← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coleton Cianci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Navan Grads CCHL 61 8 11 19 0.311 0.0676 0.0649 0.2409 0.2313
2018-19 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 54 7 16 23 0.426 0.1044 0.0948 0.2929 0.2658
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 25 4 4 8 0.320
2021-22 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D1 UCHC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D1 UCHC FR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 23 1 3 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2019-20 · Albertus Magnus
+145.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43430
Forward overall
#2298
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.