icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Burlington Cougars | OJHL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2001-02 | Burlington Cougars | OJHL | 39 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.333 | 0.0817 | 0.0807 | 0.2281 | 0.2253 |
| 2002-03 | Burlington Cougars | OJHL | 35 | 3 | 22 | 25 | 0.714 | 0.1751 | 0.1657 | 0.4889 | 0.4627 |
| 2003-04 | — | OJHL | 44 | 2 | 22 | 24 | 0.545 | 0.1337 | 0.1205 | 0.3734 | 0.3366 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Buffalo State | D3 | — | JR | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2006-07 | Fredonia | D3 | — | JR | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.600 |
| 2005-06 | Fredonia | D3 | — | SO | 25 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.440 |
| 2004-05 | Fredonia | D3 | — | FR | 21 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.333 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.