IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner Hunt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 18 2 12 14 0.778 0.0723 0.0757 0.1781 0.1864
2017-18 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 41 11 25 36 0.878 0.1152 0.1151 0.2981 0.2979
2018-19 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 42 18 26 44 1.048 0.1374 0.1300 0.3557 0.3366
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC FR 14 1 2 3 0.214
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 14 1 2 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+101.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18321
Forward overall
#877
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Schmidbauer
Salve Regina · 2013-14
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Radford
Marian · 2015-16
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Tyrrell
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.