← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Leonard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 32 2 8 10 0.312 0.0722 0.0774 0.1529 0.1638
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 47 12 20 32 0.681 0.1573 0.1598 0.3332 0.3385
2018-19 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 29 7 17 24 0.828 0.1912 0.1847 0.4049 0.3911
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Nichols D3 CNE SR 22 6 9 15 0.682
2021-22 Nichols D3 CNE JR 25 5 4 9 0.360
2020-21 Nichols D1 CNE SO 3 1 0 1 0.333
2020-21 Nichols D3 CNE SO 3 1 0 1 0.333
2019-20 Nichols D1 CNE FR 14 1 2 3 0.214
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE FR 14 1 2 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2019-20 · Nichols
+43.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23763
Forward overall
#1144
Forward born in 1998
#591
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2024-25
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.