IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Sanchez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHLP 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.0782 0.0868 0.2258 0.2507
2017-18 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 5 2 6 8 1.600 0.1928 0.1987 0.5054 0.5208
2018-19 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 35 23 37 60 1.714 0.2066 0.2020 0.5415 0.5294
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 24 4 3 7 0.292
2021-22 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Becker D3 — SO 9 1 1 2 0.222
2019-20 Becker D3 — FR 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2019-20 · Becker
-10.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19358
Forward overall
#744
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Starzi
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Donovan Hall
Neumann · 2003-04
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Zizek
SUNY Oswego · 2014-15
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.