IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Mankato East High USHS-MN 25 9 15 24 0.960 0.1215 0.1254 0.2332 0.2406
2017-18 — NA3HL 46 19 18 37 0.804 0.1009 0.1009 0.2539 0.2539
2018-19 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 46 14 22 36 0.783 0.0982 0.0930 0.2471 0.2341
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC FR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2019-20 · Gustavus Adolphus
+73.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28500
Forward overall
#1392
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevie Bryant
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Mickelsen
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Bernot
Skidmore · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.