IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dave Coleman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Oshawa Legionaires OJHL 32 10 8 18 0.562 0.1379 0.1379 0.3873 0.3873
2002-03 Oshawa Legionaires OJHL 46 14 19 33 0.717 0.1758 0.1758 0.4939 0.4939
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SR 27 6 2 8 0.296
2005-06 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 26 2 2 4 0.154
2004-05 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 25 7 18 25 1.000
2003-04 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 25 11 10 21 0.840
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2003-04 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+510.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29020
Forward overall
#1471
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Parker Wood
Endicott · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will LeNeave
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Purcell
SUNY Geneseo · 2003-04
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.