IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samir Abouelhana Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 45 19 40 59 1.311 0.2814 0.2800 0.6420 0.6389
2018-19 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 44 29 64 93 2.114 0.4536 0.4287 1.0350 0.9781
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 9 1 0 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2019-20 · SUNY Plattsburgh
-64.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6043
Forward overall
#181
Forward born in 1998
#3
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie DeAugustine
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.