← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Russell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-09-09 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Western Ontario · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Oakville Blades OJHL 48 2 9 11 0.229 0.0562 0.0615 0.1578 0.1727
2002-03 OJHL 43 1 15 16 0.372 0.0912 0.0960 0.2562 0.2698
2005-06 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 45 3 16 19 0.422 0.1035 0.0953 0.2907 0.2677
2006-07 Univ. of Western Ontario USports-M 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.1172 0.1259 0.6513 0.6995
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 24 3 5 8 0.333
2003-04 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 15 0 4 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2003-04 · Norwich
+243.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15768
Defenseman overall
#1390
Defenseman born in 1985

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.