| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Oakville Blades | OJHL | 48 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.229 | 0.0562 | 0.0615 | 0.1578 | 0.1727 |
| 2002-03 | — | OJHL | 43 | 1 | 15 | 16 | 0.372 | 0.0912 | 0.0960 | 0.2562 | 0.2698 |
| 2005-06 | Streetsville Derbys (OLD) | OJHL | 45 | 3 | 16 | 19 | 0.422 | 0.1035 | 0.0953 | 0.2907 | 0.2677 |
| 2006-07 | Univ. of Western Ontario | USports-M | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.222 | 0.1172 | 0.1259 | 0.6513 | 0.6995 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Norwich | D3 | LittleEast | SO | 24 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.333 |
| 2003-04 | Norwich | D3 | LittleEast | FR | 15 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.267 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.