← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Papa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 40 8 15 23 0.575 0.1323 0.1346 0.1822 0.1854
2017-18 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 47 10 18 28 0.596 0.1370 0.1325 0.1887 0.1825
2018-19 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 32 15 14 29 0.906 0.2084 0.1905 0.2871 0.2625
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 23 5 3 8 0.348
2021-22 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 11 2 1 3 0.273
2020-21 Saint John's D1 SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2020-21 Saint John's D3 SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2019-20 Saint John's D1 FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Saint John's D3 FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33463
Forward overall
#1678
Forward born in 1998
#1385
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.