← New Search ↗ Social Card

Darion Benchich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Westminster NE-Prep 26 1 3 4 0.154 0.0434 0.0434 0.0704 0.0704
2019-20 Westminster NE-Prep 25 9 8 17 0.680 0.1918 0.1918 0.3112 0.3112
2020-21 Skipjacks Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 22 19 9 28 1.273 0.4195 0.4195 0.4330 0.4330
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC GR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2023-24 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 25 2 12 14 0.560
2022-23 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 25 7 6 13 0.520
2021-22 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 22 6 9 15 0.682
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D1 FR 7 1 5 6 0.857
2020-21 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 7 1 5 6 0.857
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2020-21 · Lebanon Valley
+655.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19731
Forward overall
#923
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2014-15
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2006-07
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2012-13
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.