IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Phillips Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Walpole Express EHLP 21 12 5 17 0.809 0.0633 0.0625 0.1828 0.1804
2018-19 Express Hockey Club EHL 37 13 10 23 0.622 0.1334 0.1328 0.3044 0.3030
2019-20 Express Hockey Club EHL 46 15 19 34 0.739 0.1586 0.1586 0.3619 0.3619
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 23 4 3 7 0.304
2022-23 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 18 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 12 2 2 4 0.333
2020-21 Becker D3 — FR 8 0 4 4 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2020-21 · Becker
+458.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31671
Forward overall
#1414
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Hughes
Bethel · 2011-12
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Woolley
Salem State · 2017-18
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron O'Neill
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.