← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Aromatario Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Toronto Patriots OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Toronto Patriots OJHL 42 4 9 13 0.309 0.0930 0.0935 0.2119 0.2130
2018-19 OJHL 54 2 19 21 0.389 0.1168 0.1117 0.2662 0.2545
2019-20 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 54 11 36 47 0.870 0.2615 0.2615 0.5958 0.5958
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 29 3 5 8 0.276
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 28 1 10 11 0.393
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 21 3 7 10 0.476
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen FR 9 1 2 3 0.333
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 9 1 2 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2020-21 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+238.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8220
Defenseman overall
#1719
Defenseman born in 1999
#2143
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.