IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Lawler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 44 7 13 20 0.455 0.0513 0.0510 0.1546 0.1537
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 35 8 19 27 0.771 0.0870 0.0870 0.2624 0.2624
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 28 10 8 18 0.643
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 33 7 18 25 0.758
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 25 4 8 12 0.480
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 5 0 2 2 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2020-21 · Franklin Pierce
+815.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26433
Forward overall
#1352
Forward born in 1999
#1979
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonas Fredriksson
St. Olaf · 2011-12
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Thomas
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Arnason
St. Thomas · 2005-06
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.