IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Aldrich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 33 6 6 12 0.364 0.0532 0.0539 0.1783 0.1805
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 39 8 7 15 0.385 0.0563 0.0563 0.1886 0.1886
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 GR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 14 2 0 2 0.143
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 16 2 4 6 0.375
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39945
Forward overall
#2255
Forward born in 1999
#1616
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Hawkins
Hamilton · 2017-18
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hollander
Becker · 2008-09
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bunka
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.