IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camron Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 30 8 9 17 0.567 0.1309 0.1302 0.2773 0.2758
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 44 9 12 21 0.477 0.1103 0.1103 0.2335 0.2335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Assumption D2 NE10 SR 28 3 12 15 0.536
2022-23 Assumption D2 NE10 JR 30 5 8 13 0.433
2021-22 Assumption D2 NE10 SO 21 2 2 4 0.191
2020-21 Assumption D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8724
Defenseman overall
#1761
Defenseman born in 1999
#1111
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Flannery
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Dozois
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Britner
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.