IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camron Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 30 8 9 17 0.567 0.0829 0.0825 0.2779 0.2764
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 44 9 12 21 0.477 0.0698 0.0698 0.2340 0.2340
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Assumption D2 NE10 SR 28 3 12 15 0.536
2022-23 Assumption D2 NE10 JR 30 5 8 13 0.433
2021-22 Assumption D2 NE10 SO 21 2 2 4 0.191
2020-21 Assumption D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8433
Defenseman overall
#1734
Defenseman born in 1999
#1110
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Beaulieu
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Flannery
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Heisinger
Curry · 2011-12
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.