IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Christensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 41 17 24 41 1.000 0.3519 0.3473 0.4903 0.4839
2019-20 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 46 15 49 64 1.391 0.4896 0.4896 0.6822 0.6822
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 30 5 10 15 0.500
2022-23 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 29 8 9 17 0.586
2021-22 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 19 6 8 14 0.737
2020-21 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
22%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7465
Forward overall
#319
Forward born in 1999
#61
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Zimmerman
Hamilton · 2021-22
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Auggie Moore
Saint John's · 2017-18
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Amante
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.