IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Lyons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 42 10 7 17 0.405 0.0529 0.0518 0.1374 0.1345
2019-20 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 43 23 37 60 1.395 0.1825 0.1825 0.4736 0.4736
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 30 4 4 8 0.267
2022-23 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 33 9 9 18 0.545
2021-22 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 16 1 1 2 0.125
2020-21 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13936
Forward overall
#635
Forward born in 1999
#759
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Slovak
Endicott · 2014-15
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
West Bauman
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Björkman
Nichols · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.